Bonnie,
>Jim,
>
>>It is quite clear (now) that someone has to complain about a message first BEFORE any form of review/judgement is done.
>
>Just curious here, Jim ... do you *know* this for a fact? Do you have some inside information that the rest of us don't have? I haven't seen that stated anywhere publicly by UT management (unless I missed a post somewhere).
I don't "know" (that's why I used the term 'quite clear', but here's the reasoning...
KevinG informed the world (accidentally, I know) of certain "transgressions" by myself, using the exact terminologies that rendered messages "sensitive", yet that message remains UNmarked as "sensitive".
In that same message KevinG informed the world that I had revised my message but 'not before it had been tagged'. There's really only one way for him to know that - to have been aware that someone has informed UT management and obtained a 'favorable' decision. KevinG happened to know that I had been "tagged" even before I was informed of such tagging.
What else can anyone conclude???
Ideas?
>
>~~Bonnie
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement