>>Here's one for ya:
>>Re: Do something about one member's comportment HERE Thread #943178 Message #943783
>
>Wait a minute Jim ... that's the one we were just talking about that you said was *not* marked sensitive, isn't it? (this is the one that you updated quite a bit *after* it had been marked sensitive so that it didn't sound quite as bad as it originally was).

Yes, that's the one (of the 2) that I'm talking about. But KevinG's still has the words in it yet is remains UNmarked!
Also, I do not recollect the message being already marked as sensitive when I did change it (twice). But it could have been and I just didn't see it. It would seem odd to me that I'd be allowed to edit it after marking though.

Jim

>
>~~Bonnie
>
>
>
>>
>>Now you know!
>>
>>
>>
>>>>SNIP
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks Mark, now this thread (or is it just the individual posts) will be marked sensitive. Actually I've yet to see the sensitive mark being referred to in the Chatter Forum - maybe it's a PUTM thing.
>>>>
>>>>No, Houston, it's quite apparent now that the progress towards a "sensitive mesage" marker begins with a complasint by a member.
>>>>
>>>>Seems some members have a little trouble replying to such a message that "offends" them yet have no trouble at all composing and sending a message to UT management. Go fifure!
>>>>
>>>>cheers, from a convicted obscenist
>>>
>>>Hi Jim,
>>>
>>>Actually, I've yet to see the marker being referred to anywhere (and in any forum). And in the Chatter Forum yesterday, some specific messages were being ID'd, and even following the links and viewing the thread map, did not reveal the marker. I even went as far as viewing the source html, to see if there was a reference to something in there that might lead to my enlightenment - alas no joy. I guess someone is going to have to spell it out for me.