>George,
>
>Rather than post a reply to this drivel I thought I'd offer you the option to retract what you say here.
>
Jim,

Nope! I won't. Here's the problem. On two different occasions you used "that phrase" in response to a technical post. Regardless of who was correct there is no place for that kind of language here. None, zip, nada. And further, there's no justification for it. In fact, in one of those two instances, the post wasn't a reply to one of your's. IIRC, you never apologized to either of the people.

In something that's non-technical, I might be able to understand. We let our lesser self take over. Yet, in this case, you want Michel to take some action about someone else's "opinion". Not technical at all.

My late father once told me this. "If you're going to be man enough to stand up and fight for what you believe in, then be man enough to apologize if you're wrong." You're wrong here yet you remain completely unapologetic.

Finally, who died and left you in charge of how we comport ourselves? No one! You've attacked me, you've mis-quoted me, you've taken what I've said out of context. I won't post back. I won't post to you. Kindly do me the favor of doing the same. In my mind you're a...(I won't finish this phrase.)