>>>

1. Addition of a Complaint button.

The Complaint button:
>>>
>>>This button enables someone to complain about some wordings in the message. The action triggers a Reply with some special features:
>>
>>>

1. A Complaint-text is inserted on top. This text also includes the full list of the Rules section.
   >
   >I'd rather have the complainant select the rule(s) which are supposedly broken, not the full text of them all.
   >
   >> I think, this button should create a private UT message to the moderators (e.g. all UT team members, not just Michel) and to the accused (if the complaining person wants to notify the accused as well). It could also send an e-mail message, if the special Account option is set so (Send me Complaining messages by e-mail)
   >
   >Noooo... why would anyone want to be subscribed to reading the complaints? If there's such a person, I'd either have pity for the guy who does that for a living, or wouldn't sit anywhere near someone who'd read them all voluntarily.
   >
   
   Hi Dragan,
   
   I think, I was not enough clear so you misunderstood. I meant, that the violator and the UT team would receive private message in UT interface. In addition to private message in UT they optionally can receive the same message by e-mail. I think, it's the same as receiving replies and private messages by e-mail (I believe, there is such an option (is it PUTM only, don't remember), but I do not use it. E.g. only persons involved in the incident could receive such e-mails, if they choose the appropriate option in their account.
   
   >>>
2. The complainant is asked to remove all items that do not apply.
   >>>
3. The complainant is asked to remove all original text that is not relevant.
   >
   >I think this goes a bit against the current software - I think the messages aren't ever removed, and there are limits to how long is a message editable. I think the offer of retraction would be more appropriate.
   
   I agree. Also as I said in my original response I think the originator of the violating message has a right to update it (if no one answered yet). The sensitivity mark would be removed, but some indication that the message was edited is needed for such cases.
   
   BTW, just re-read my original text and you're right, it sounded abmigious. I even laugh, because it's funny...
   If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
   
   
   My Blog