Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Handling T&C violations
Message
De
28/09/2004 05:27:45
Peter De Valença
Haarlem, Pays-Bas
 
 
À
27/09/2004 23:14:59
Naomi Nosonovsky
Wisconsin, États-Unis
Information générale
Forum:
Level Extreme
Catégorie:
Autre
Titre:
Re: Handling T&C violations
Divers
Thread ID:
00946220
Message ID:
00946579
Vues:
22
>>>>
  1. Addition of a Complaint button.
The Complaint button:
>>>>
>>>>This button enables someone to complain about some wordings in the message. The action triggers a Reply with some special features:
>>>
>>>>
  1. A Complaint-text is inserted on top. This text also includes the full list of the Rules section.
    >>
    >>I'd rather have the complainant select the rule(s) which are supposedly broken, not the full text of them all.
    >>
    >>> I think, this button should create a private UT message to the moderators (e.g. all UT team members, not just Michel) and to the accused (if the complaining person wants to notify the accused as well). It could also send an e-mail message, if the special Account option is set so (Send me Complaining messages by e-mail)
    >>
    >>Noooo... why would anyone want to be subscribed to reading the complaints? If there's such a person, I'd either have pity for the guy who does that for a living, or wouldn't sit anywhere near someone who'd read them all voluntarily.
    >>
    >
    >Hi Dragan,
    >
    >I think, I was not enough clear so you misunderstood. I meant, that the violator and the UT team would receive private message in UT interface. In addition to private message in UT they optionally can receive the same message by e-mail. I think, it's the same as receiving replies and private messages by e-mail (I believe, there is such an option (is it PUTM only, don't remember), but I do not use it. E.g. only persons involved in the incident could receive such e-mails, if they choose the appropriate option in their account.
    >
    >>>>
  2. The complainant is asked to remove all items that do not apply.
    >>>>
  3. The complainant is asked to remove all original text that is not relevant.
    >>
    >>I think this goes a bit against the current software - I think the messages aren't ever removed, and there are limits to how long is a message editable. I think the offer of retraction would be more appropriate.
    >
    >I agree. Also as I said in my original response I think the originator of the violating message has a right to update it (if no one answered yet). The sensitivity mark would be removed, but some indication that the message was edited is needed for such cases.
    >
    >BTW, just re-read my original text and you're right, it sounded abmigious. I even laugh, because it's funny...

    The item [The complainant is asked to remove all original text that is not relevant.] applies to the complaint-message, not to the original message.
    Groet,
    Peter de Valença

    Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
    If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
    Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
    "There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
    If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform