Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Versions, Windows OS and Database backends
Message
De
17/10/2004 12:35:14
 
 
À
17/10/2004 12:22:21
Information générale
Forum:
Level Extreme
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
00951983
Message ID:
00952083
Vues:
8
Michel,

VFP6 was distributed in Visual Studio, which itself does have Service Packs 1-5 inclusive (because I have them in hand). I don't know if there were other service packs beyond that, nor do I know if VFP6 was distributed outside of VS6 and may have had it's own SPs for that distribution.

I still think listing "Other" under databases is the only practical way to go. I've heard of many different ones and some new one could pop up tomorrow. For instance, I think I've heard "Firebird" as one. You could put "Other (pls. name in body)".

Finally, the network OS and type of network remain important factors in helping others to debug problems. Especially if peer-to-peer, but also Novell, SAMBA?, etc.

Jim


>>VFP versions should include VFP6 SP3 and VFP6 SP5.
>
>I have arranged it for SP1, SP2 and SP3, etc. I didn't do it for VFP and preserved Visual FoxPro. See with the list. Let me know if that is still needed to have VFP as the naming convention
>
>Was there SP2 and SP4 for VFP6?
>
>>The database list should include "Other".
>
>As we know the names, we should include the names of the missing ones. There is no need to have Other as it won't give any much more additional information than selecting the blank.
>
>>Also, I feel that all lists should be listed with more common at the top (and going downwards where versions are concerned). So VFP should probably be listed VFP9 first... FPD last. OSs should be, in my opinion, XP first, Win2K second, Win2003 third and the rest by age.
>
>Done.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform