You're right

I wonder what's significant about this value band, except that 64 is, of course that magic binary, hex number. But what about 81?

>Hi guys,
>
>I got a good one for you. I've tried this in fox 7, 8 and also 9 beta. Simple way to reproduce the problem:
>
>?ROUND(64.225000000000000000000000000000000000,2)
>?ROUND(63.225000000000000000000000000000000000,2)
>
>Why do I get 64,22 for the first one and 63.23 for the second one ? The round value doesn't seem to be right between 64 and 81. I tried this :
>
>?ROUND(64.225000000000000000000000000000000000,2)
>to
>?ROUND(81.225000000000000000000000000000000000,2)
>
>and the round isn't right !!
>
>Somebody and notice this problem ?
>
>Note : ?ROUND(ROUND(64.225000000000000000000000000000000000,10),2)is working well, strange isn't it :)