Yes it's a weird behavior I don't understand too. I didn't test if another band of value might react the same way, I'll check that.
>You're right
>
>I wonder what's significant about this value band, except that 64 is, of course that magic binary, hex number. But what about 81?
>
>>Hi guys,
>>
>>I got a good one for you. I've tried this in fox 7, 8 and also 9 beta. Simple way to reproduce the problem:
>>
>>?ROUND(64.225000000000000000000000000000000000,2)
>>?ROUND(63.225000000000000000000000000000000000,2)
>>
>>Why do I get 64,22 for the first one and 63.23 for the second one ? The round value doesn't seem to be right between 64 and 81. I tried this :
>>
>>?ROUND(64.225000000000000000000000000000000000,2)
>>to
>>?ROUND(81.225000000000000000000000000000000000,2)
>>
>>and the round isn't right !!
>>
>>Somebody and notice this problem ?
>>
>>Note : ?ROUND(ROUND(64.225000000000000000000000000000000000,10),2)is working well, strange isn't it :)
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only