Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Job Market Southern California
Message
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00952285
Message ID:
00953341
Views:
21
Speculations aside, the fact is that there are no WMD's. Never were.
Iraq might have had ambitions - but wanting something and actually having them
is two different things.



>>The chief weapons inspector said last week that Iraq NEVER had weapons of
>>mass destruction because the 12 years of sactions worked. Iraq said all
>>along they had no WMD's.
>>
>
>The sanctions did NOT work. They have been finding additional wmds in limited quantities, even though they are only spot checking a few locations. The oil for food program was in full play and the ultimate goal was to line enough foreign government politicians pockets with money so as to be able to garner their support. Germany and France have many power brokers who were heavily involved and made millions of this program. Kinda helps you understand why they didn't want us to attack Iraq, doesn't it?
>
>Well, the latest report postulated that some of the CWs were moved into Syria. Also, it should be noted that only a fraction of a fraction of the sites were investigated. Here's an excerpt from the Duelfer report:
>
>CW munitions. ISG investigation, however, was hampered
>by several factors beyond our control. The scale
>and complexity of Iraqi munitions handling, storage,
>and weapons markings, and extensive looting and
>destruction at military facilities during OIF significantly
>limited the number of munitions that ISG was
>able to thoroughly inspect.
>
>• ISG technical experts fully evaluated less than one
>quarter of one percent of the over 10,000 weapons
>caches throughout Iraq, and visited fewer than ten
>ammunition depots identified prior to OIF as suspect
>CW sites.
>
>the above excerpt is taken from:
>http://www.foia.cia.gov/duelfer/Iraqs_WMD_Vol3.pdf page 39.
>
>>I serverd in the 1st gulf war. I saw firsthand the state of the Iraqi
>>military BEFORE we destroyed them. They were no threat to us then 3 years
>>ago.
>>
>>We attacked them anyway.
>
>So, was he a threat to the thousands of people whose bodies have been found in mass graves? Are you of the opinion that he only knew Ben Laden casually? Saddam ran the country with an iron fist and had his scientist working to develop sarin gas. I know you know how deadly that is.
>As for their army's capabilities, we don't have to apoligize because we are better equipped, better trained, and therefore the best military in the world. Peace through strength. A bully never picks on a strong man, only the weak.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind
public class SystemCrasher :ICrashable
In addition, an integer field is not for irrational people
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform