>Everything that hasn't occured "remains to be seen." That is a specious argument. You're also not good at spelling - it's TexAs!<vbg> The election process is moving forward and I'm sure you and Kerry will be VERY disappointed when they occur. Which would you rather, elections or a dictator who uses sarin gas on the population, kills men,women and babies, then has them shoved into mass graves?

And yet you're the one who claimed elections are going to take place in Iraq in January.

Actually, what I would have preferred are many things. For starters, when the administration claimed that Iraq had stockpiles of WMDs it would have been nice if they were right. And before we forget, that was the reason we went in, not the fact that he gassed his own people in the 80s, or the other human rights abuses that took place.

Secondly, it would have been nice if the military, rather than two politicians, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, ran this war. How quickly we've forgetten the lessons learned from Vietnam.

>Actually, we're very strong, we just can't get anyone to punch "the button." This whole thing would be over if we just nuked the region, went in and took over! (I know that punched YOUR button!)

Naw, I just see it as ducking.