>It's interesting how people will quote sources and never actually read them. I think it's apropos when those same sources can be used to discredit their key argument
Hmm, so what does the blurb about only checking a fraction of the arms mean to you? As for using the same source to discredit something, there's nothing unique about that. As slick willie said, "it depends on what the meaning of IS is."
John Harvey
Shelbynet.com
"I'm addicted to placebos. I could quit, but it wouldn't matter." Stephen Wright