>>James,
>>>
>>>After Bush has won, several news organizations recounted all the Florida ballots and they found that Bush still won. So I still don't see how the election was stolen.
>>
>>The point is that the Supreme Court stopped the recount after the Florida Supreme Court had approved it. The point is that the Florida Secretary of State did everything she could to stop the recount.
>>
>>Now, while the U.S. Supreme Court was correct by the letter of the law, they were incorrect by the spirit.
>>
>>I won't argue about the point about the election "being stolen". I will, however, argue the point that we, to this day, don't really know whether or not the outcome was correct.
>>
>
>Yes we do. After every recount, Bush still was the winner.
>
>How many times do we have to recount???????????
>

Tommy,

I favored a full re-count of every contested state. That Florida's was never completed, with about a 500+ difference, makes me question. Especially in view of the 500,000+ popular vote for Gore.

Those in government are public servants. As such they need to be responsive to the best interests of the public. When the Florida Secretary of State initially blocks the re-counts and delays the process, was she acting as a public servant, or a partisan?