It was all foretold years ago. I think everyone in the past got and will get a piece of the pie by some means in the future (except Iraq that is):

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A18841-2002Sep14¬Found=true
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EA22Ak01.html
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2004/10/05/040.html
http://www.sltrib.com/nationworld/ci_2431964
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25416-2004Oct11.html
http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/globalguerrillas/2004/07/gg_target_iraqi.html

>>>Unfortunately, Hilmar, we've gotten ourselves into "...another fine mess". We can't just pack up and go.
>>
>>Not exactly what I had in mind (pack and go), but what with the new government and all that, I thought the number of troups might gradually be reduced. It now seems that I was wrong.
>
>I don't think it should be surprising that there might be a need for more troops before there is the ability to leave... assuming you truly want to leave the place... and in better shape than it was when you went in.
>
>It will be interesting to see, in the end, just what oil contracts are signed and with what royalties going to the Iraqi people, and how many military bases the U.S. requires to be made "available" to the on some long-term basis.
>
>cheers