>What I want to see achieved is what I said above. How this is going be carried out. I don't know. Possibly some laws have to be adjusted. It might be a matter of perspective. If you really focus on a group trouble makers and track them and apply a '3 strike, you're out' policy to them, you're not treating everyone equally either (because you won't focus on everyone). There are instruments helping on this, on first sight unequal system, to support this stance. For example justice could describe such a group as a criminal organisation, which allows different handling of the crimes beeing commited.

If that were the case then in the US all Italians may have been considered part of a criminal organization in the 1940s. Or the Irish at the turn of the century. Or African Americans now? Because we all know that they are the cause of all the crime in our cities. That's sarcasm, by the way, for anyone lurking. Dressing it up and spraying perfume on it doesn't change the fact that any law like that would be incredibly biased.

>>Are those people being sent back citizens?
>
>??? sorry could you rephrase that one?

My point was, I understand that persons who do not have citizenship usually do not have the same rights as those who do. There are differences in rights between citizen, legal non-citizen and illegal aliens. But, this is not applicable along lines of race, regligion, gender, etc. I was trying to find out into which your "group" fell.