>Terry:
>
>Yes I agree with you. I was just watching Tim Russet last night. The Whiote House says that W got more votes than any previous President. They don't mention that Kerry also got more votes than any previous President.
>

I believe the man's name is "Russert". Doesn't matter how many votes the LOSER got, he's still a LOSER.

>Now they believe they have a mandate to hammer Iraq even harder.
>

YEP, Canada is next.

>The unfortunate thing, is that the people who voted for George don't even know where Iraq is. They were voting for "right to life", "anti gay" and "morality". The other issues about the war, unemployment and social security did not resonate with them.
>

That's ok, we know where Canada is.


>The other issue is that George got the majority of the less educated voters. Voters with University education tended to vote for Kerry. So all the Republicans have to do is keep the schools underfunded and they can stay in forever.
>

Guess what, there's no correlation between money spent on education and outcome. Washington, DC has some of the highest per capita spending on education, and some of the worst test scores.

>I don't agree that all Presidents are the same. I think Bill Clinton could get his mind around issues and he did improve the environment and Medical Care. I think if he could have stayed in power, 911 would have been handled in a much more intelligent manner.

The environment has improved even more under Bush. Los Angeles was touting how the air there is as clean as it's been in the last 25 years, just last week. Intelligent manner? "I have a plan" . . . . Funny we never saw any of those plans. Bush has a plan, a program and a track record. Oh yeah, did I mention, he won reelection!