>Charles Krauthammer has a brilliant analysis at
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A44082-2004Nov11.htmlI can't read it. I'm not a subscriber. I don't want to subscribe. I've got enough things to read already.
Can't you resume in a line or two what's being said in there?
Brilliant? Is it because it respects your line of thought <bg>
*******************************************************
Save a tree, eat a beaver.
Denis Chassé