>>Charles Krauthammer has a brilliant analysis at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A44082-2004Nov11.html
>
>I can't read it. I'm not a subscriber. I don't want to subscribe. I've got enough things to read already.
>
>Can't you resume in a line or two what's being said in there?
>
>Brilliant? Is it because it respects your line of thought <bg>

It's a free subscription. You really need to read the entire article. I can't make that determination for you. You'll take away from his analysis what you want.