>>Right on.
>>I'm just trying to present another view. I not trying to advocate one over the other because I surely don't know myself.
>
>OK, fine. But nit-picking one measuring technique as a potential source of relatively minor inaccuracy does not present another view per se. It just argues that there exists some measure of error in the exact measurement of extremey old objects.
>
>When measuring the age of things in hundreds of thousands of years, or even millions of years, then a margin of error here or there does not invalidate the theory of evolution itself.

There are some argument about the actual age of the universe that I can present, but won't (unless you care to hear it).

>
>But whatever makes people happy is great. As long as we all go out and buy VFP9, VFP10,...VFPn then I'm ok with it :)

VFP10,... VFPn? you know something I don't about this? Would you like to share it with the rest of us?