>>>Right on.
>>>I'm just trying to present another view. I not trying to advocate one over the other because I surely don't know myself.
>>
>>OK, fine. But nit-picking one measuring technique as a potential source of relatively minor inaccuracy does not present another view per se. It just argues that there exists some measure of error in the exact measurement of extremey old objects.
>>
>>When measuring the age of things in hundreds of thousands of years, or even millions of years, then a margin of error here or there does not invalidate the theory of evolution itself.
>
>There are some argument about the actual age of the universe that I can present, but won't (unless you care to hear it).

There appears to be quite a concensus amongst the scientific community in this regard. What I have read appears to make sense to me as a layman. Thanks anyway.