>John;
>
>I have an encyclopedia that was published in 1888 and dedicated to my grandfather when he was born in 1890. In that book there are many “facts and theories” about science. It is truly amazing how different we look upon those same topics today.

You make my point. Ever hear of evolution science called a "theory" when the evolutionists are teaching it? I don't think so, they are the most closed minded bunch you will find. They deny the flaws in their argument and disregard the facts in creation science.

>
>Theories change as a matter of personal acceptance of the majority and of the moment. What we have been taught in school will surely be obsolete and found to be invalid in the future. Even religions are dynamic to a degree. There are many versions of the bible in different languages. Some religions place particular emphasis upon specific parts of the bible.
>
>I do not think anyone can say with certainty that a theory from science or an interpretation from a religious document is infallible. You have to have faith to agree with either source.
>
>Tom

That was my point, either way you look at it, it is based on faith. I say there is a God, someone else says there isn't. I say prove there isn't and they have a much harder time than me, I think.