>>>>>I'm curious Rich, where do you think morality comes from?
>>>>
>>>>Evolution.
>>>>
>>>>A species that had mothers and fathers with no interest in their families well being would be eliminated by natural selection. The species that had interest in the well being of thier offspring, and society (schools of fish, packs of wolves, ect.) would leave more offspring behind and thus be the "fittest."
>>>
>>>You remind me of the guy who took the rorsach test and everytime they showed him a flashcard, he said something that involved a naked woman. The therapist grew exasperated and finally said, 'it seems you see naked women everywhere.' The guy responded, don't blame me, they're your cards!<g>
>>>
>>>You see evolution in everything I guess. We'll have to agree to disagree on this issue. I've read several of the evolutionists propoganda and also investigate the things the other side has to say. I'm afraid I come down on the side of creationism. You might want to go to www.christiananswers.net and do a little research. Be careful though, you might start to see the light!<g>
>>
>>First of all, you didn't address my argument.
>
>Your argument is specious. You can neither prove,nor disprove it. Therefore, it is only an argument.

My argument is a conjecture. We discuss conjectures critically. You note that it is a conjecture and therefore it is not worth discussing critically.


>>Think about it. Let's take Noah's Ark. On that Ark we'll put a male and a female of Lion type1 and Lion type2.
>>
>>The Lion type1 is genetically inclined to care for their young, make sure they are protected through infancy, properly nurished, and taught how to fend for themselves.
>>
>>Lion type2 lacks such compassion towards their young.
>>
>>If we assumed that these were the only differences in the lion, and we shipped them of the Ark onto a continent, 10 generations later, which species of lion do you suppose would be more populus on the continent? Does it not seem logical that the type1 would be?
>>
>
>According to the evolutionists theory, wouldn't they mutate and turn into some other life form?

According to evolutionists theory it is because of mutations that there are two different types of lions.

You have again demonstrated profound ignorance about evolution.

>You know you don't have to resort to name calling. You'll only wind up apologizing later.<g>

You asked a question, I gave you an answer, and because it wasn't the answer you were expecting, you couldn't go any further with the discussion.

If you showed that you can in fact engage in discussion at some tolerable intellectual level I would apologize.

>I'm not dogmatic on how it all occured ... My issue is the science has to square with what the Bible says and evolutionism doesn't.

Total contradiction.