Hi Thomas.

Sorry, but I have not understood.

>Hi Fabio,
>
>I'ld rather have a set or sys() to protocol memvar accesses without mdot.
>
>While your approach would work well in situations involving only code
>from a tightly controlled group of (expirienced) programmers, it could break even more
>easily when including other sources or indisciplined programmers.
>

1. You approve yes or not this SET or SYS?

>Having a protocol enables me to fix even my own borderlines:
>if A LOT needs to be done, I can build a patching routine.
>

2. What is it the protocol ?

>And with such tools even the MS examples could be cleaned up
>to be a better yardstick for "new" programmers.

>
>regards
>
>thomas

Fabio