I see. Thanks Robert.

I found it 'odd' because I understand "snapshot" to mean any picture showing something at an instant in time whether it was moving or not. As opposed to a video or a movie.

I will add your qualification to my internal dictionary.

cheers


>Hi Jim!
>
>With "absolutely not suitable for snap-shots" I mean that when "shooting" a moving object the result isn't sharp due to the long "reaction-time" (= from pushing the button to taking the picture - I don't now the right word for his).
>
>Images of non-moving objects are brilliant, you can "turn it" for best positioning and it's small and reliable - but for snap-shots too slow.
>
>>Hi Robert,
>>
>>Not an answer for you, but a question...
>>
>>If the camera is "absolutely not suitable for snap-shots" then what makes it a "... great cam..."?
>>
>>cheers
>>
>>
>>>Hi all!
>>>
>>>I'm planning to buy a new digicam - a "Ricoh Caplio R1" - and would be interested in experience reports.
>>>Now I have a "Nikon Coolpix 2500" ... great cam but a little bit slow and absolutely not suitable for snap-shots.
>>>
>>>Google provides lots of reports but I prefer real-time experiences.
>>>
>>>Thanks!!!