>>>From within this consciousness, emerging out of your unique collection of observations and knowledge, there is a world.
>>
>>If I say "that corvette is a cool car..." it could be that only in my own little world, it is a cool car.
>>
>>But, if I say "that corvette has four wheels..." then this statement is either right or wrong.
>
>And how is "right or wrong" determined?
>
>You could say that "a corvette has four wheels" but that's not what I'm talking about.
>
>What I'm talking about is what you believe. If you believe that corvette has four wheels, then it is right.

Well, depends on the mental state of the person. If the person believes that 2+2!=4, or if he believes that anything less then four is the same as having four wheels then he has problems, not only in driving.... :)

How about this... a man shoots and kills some one you love (assuming you have a loving spouse, relative or someone close). You take him to court. But he says "I really don't believe that I killed him/her...". Is he right/innocent?

According to you (if you believe in relative reality) this is a legitimate defense for murder.


>
>
>>>To tackle this question thoroughly we need to assume that the words "exist", "existence", "real", "reality", and "something" are all refering to the same thing. Anything that is something is real, it exists; reality is made up of everything in existence.
>>>
>>>So back to the question. Is existence subjective or objective or both?
>>
>>If it truly exist and it can be verified, it exist.
>
>It occurs to me that only what is subjectively known can even be attempted to be verified.


I'l buy that. Everything else is theory, assumption or intuition/hunch.
Although you attempt to verify theories and assumptions.


>
>So how do you verify that something exists?

Go to Paris France and see the tower yourself. It really exist.

>
>It also occurs to me that your subjective experience is the only method you have of validation.

Yes, but I also know that something not visible to the eye may exist, like "GOD".