>I don't say that you are incorrect fully, but the point is the EOF(), nothing other,
>and i don't see the EOF() word into your message.
>Of course a EOF() record is a empty/blank record,
> but a empty/blank record can to be a not EOF() record,
>then empty/blank is not equivalent to EOF().
>
>If you don't want look into my repro code, it is a your problem.

Fabio,

Now it's not the deleted first record anymore but EOF() vs a blank record? It's sad to watch how you're trying to get out of the corner you put yourself with your statement, "No, it do a evaluation at the current record...". My code shows that you're mistaken. Your code again proves my point but substitutes blank record with EOF(). The end result is the same. So stop playing with words, admit your mistake and get over it.