>Set feedback on
>
>This thursday I went to a MS event on ASP 2.0
>Like always those events are first class.
>
>But something I noted. Where we're asked about the development language we use the choices look something like
>VB 6 and before
>VC++ 6 and before
>VS .Net
>all versions of VFP
>
>This bugs me a bit.
>
>All versions of VFP could mean that it's been a while since there's been a new version for it. don't you think is should be
>
>VFP 9 and before

What about it? I actually don't see a problem here, since half of the VFP community uses a version of FoxPro earlier than 8.0. This feedback should be given to those who hosted the event and creatd that list, not to me. Although I see no problem with it, there is no real issue here.