In Thai the written language (alphabet based on Sanskrit ) has tonal markers - just part of the spelling. Sometimes the spelling is just completely different ( different 'M' used - based on origin of word ) Not sure in Chinese - just different characters I guess.

Of course sometimes the tonal differences are part of dialect and the written language may only reflect one version of the language. ( definitely the case in Lao. In Cambodian a missionary for Wycliffe Bible Society actually had to develop a written language for "high" Cambodian so he could translate the Bible into that very distinct flavor of the language. - pretty sure he was the only person that ever read it that way but ... )


>>It is just so conceptually different to have the pitch/tone of a word determine its meaning. The word 'ma' in Thai can mean mother, dog, horse, or come depending on the tone. Thai has only 5 tones. Lao has 7 or 9. I think Mandarin has 5 and Cantonese 9. I've never been able to hear the distinction of more than 7 and then only in controlled drills. You can get it from context, usually, but when speaking it is unlikely you'll get it right except by accident <g> unless you've spoken it from childhood.
>>
>>We are so used to changing the pitch of a word to inflect meaning to the sentence that it is a hard habit to break.
>
>How do they understand the written word (a book or newspaper), by context?
>
>
>
>>It also explains why vocal music in Chinese is really awful to Western ears. <g>
>
>That it does.