Charles, I don't want to make this any more of a UT issue than it is (which is not at all!) so after due consideration, here's my last word on the topic:
If I were involved in FoxRockx and received such an approach, I'd create a FoxRockx policy: archived articles can be eradicated at their author's request for whatever reason (e.g. because later versions of Fox made the content incorrect or misleading.) Eradication consists of a grey box overlaid on the article with a footnote pointing to the FoxRockx policy. I'd create an entry form requiring identification of the author/s and the article they want removed- what volume/edition etc. Then I'd advise this author of the policy and furnish an entry form for his use.
Then I'd get on with creating my exciting magazine, confident that the complainant has an adequate remedy should he choose to make use of it.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1