Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
Message
De
01/12/2010 03:47:17
 
 
À
01/12/2010 03:32:41
Lutz Scheffler
Lutz Scheffler Software Ingenieurbüro
Dresden, Allemagne
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Versions des environnements
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9
OS:
Windows 7
Divers
Thread ID:
01491162
Message ID:
01491332
Vues:
54
>>>>>Why CursorFill() is faster than CursorRefresh() in a CA?
>>>>>Note that both functions returns the same number of records and uses the same SelectCmd...
>>>>
>>>>CursorFill()
>>>>create the CA.Alias dbf
>>>>
>>>>CursorRefresh()
>>>>1. create a temp dbf
>>>>2. copy temp.dbf into the CA.Alias dbf
>>>>
>>>>the step 2. can require enough time,
>>>>and this force the dbf structure to not change
>>>
>>>Hi Fabio,
>>>
>>>are your shure?
>>>
>>>the DBF() is someting like SYS(2015)+'.DBF'
>>>I can see DBF(CA.ALIAS) change with every CursorRefresh.
>>>I run in this indexing a CA / View after Requery / CursorRefresh
>>>
>>>Agnes
>>
>>try to attach the CA.alias to a Grid.
>
>Done
>DBF() changes with every cursorrefresh Simple to see on Statusbar
>
dbf here does not change.

>No idea why the grid should make a difference

Grid do not like if recordsource file handle change
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform