>>>>Not that bad.
>>>
>>>does this mean 'excellent'?
>>>
>>>to me, that's what GoFish deserves.
>>
>>I'm not that deep into it. I've done simple tests, found nothing I've not done with Code Reference at first glance. There are other information return and a different way to select extendsions, but then I'm comfortable with strings.
>>Possibly this is I'm not mouse addicted. The whole opposite seems true, this feels hard for keyboard navigation. To tab through all those checkboxes, what a pain. Sometimes there are keyboard shortcuts, sometime are not. Tab order confused.
>>
>>But than I've crashed into 4/17/2015 and PI =3.1415, storage to drive C:, one setting for all projects. No exception. Decimal comma. I do stuff parallel and I realy like the way Code Refernece has a history for every project. Date is DMY time is 24 hours. While I'm in general comfortable with english forms this will not happen.
>>
>>For the moment it's a no go. And I see no need to hack me into it.
>>
>>But again, this is only my POV. I've only give it a try because others seems to realy like it.
>>I'm procrastinating the next job. I should just focus more on that.
>>:)
>
>FWIW, when I first started using GoFish, I was bothered by its lack of history, but when I realized I could run many searches in the time Code References took to run one, and that GoFish would remember what I'd search, just not the results, I got over it pretty fast.
>
>Tamar


>>>FWIW, when I first started using GoFish, I was bothered by its lack of history, but when I realized I could run many searches in the time Code References took to run one, and that GoFish would remember what I'd search, just not the results, I got over it pretty fast.


FYI - Good news... There's a beta version that stores and recalls history of searches. Let me know if you'd like to test it out.