>>>Some reporters starting asking some of the republican's running for president - if they had a family member that was having a gay wedding, would they go to it? The answers these guys provided (although I know at least one simply didn't answer the question) was some of the most ridiculous things you could imagine.
>>
>>>> The answers these guys provided (although I know at least one simply didn't answer the question) was some of the most ridiculous things you could imagine.
>>
>>If the answers were ridiculous, how about the questions?
>
>I agree with you, sort of. But this kind of question lets you measure a number of things about the candidate, including sincerity.
>
>You may remember that in (I think it was) 2012, in one of the Republican debates, candidates were asked whether they belief in the theory of evolution. Leaving aside that "believe" is the wrong verb, the fact that virtually all of them said "no" meant to me that they wouldn't use science in decision-making, and that's dangerous. While the question wasn't about the critical issues of the day, it said something about how they face the world.
>
>Tamar

I agree about the evolution question. That's a good indicator.