>>But I can say that the Washington Post, Politifact, USA Today, WSJ, Barney Frank (a Democrat), and a large number of American voters concluded that he lied. If you're right, that means an awful lot of "towers of silliness". :)
LOL at the argumentum ad verecundiam fallacy. But I'll bite. When they called it a lie, did they know the grandfathering date still would not be reached in 2016? Did they produce a portfolio of crying voters who lost their cherished plans as a verified consequence of the ACA? I would have thought that this would be a media gold mine- if it were true.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
