>>
>>But the system has failed then in this case. The population majority are now effectively unrepresented as the Republicans have won everything.
>
>Nicholas, the Ds held everything in 2008, and shoved a horrible ACA law down the throats of the American people.
>
>And then they lost the House in 2010, and then the Senate in 2014, and now the White House.
>
>I have made the following point about a hundred times. In 2013 roughly a dozen D senators up for re-election went screaming to Obama on ACA - their concerns about it, and how much their constituency hated it. Obama doubled down in the 2014 mid-terms and told Americans that his policies were in the ballot. Well, the rest is history - the Republicans (figuratively) punched the Democrats in the mouth, winning control of the Senate, winning governor races, and winning in state legislatures. It was a political humiliation for the Ds.
>
>From any context of U.S. government and even basic civics, it is incorrect to say, "the population majority are now effectively unrepresented". I will quote Barack Obama - "want to change things? Go win an election"
Yes I do see that . But. There's always a but. When the electoral system was set up it was a completely different world. In the times we have now of national politics,issues ,campaigns the internet etc doesn't it make more sense to have a national figure elected nationally on a one person one vote basis.
BTW I'm not arguing ths about Clinton Trump the same would apply if it was the other way round.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only