>>My response to Kevin's was only in regard to his comment about the treatment of James Rosen, and the response in the media to that. (Message #1648364)
I don't know what you're implying. Please post links or citations.

Oh, please.

In this thread:

SS>>I see a link to media coverage of the sordid history of desecration, in the same article that you referenced.... I would call this "real NOT news".

JR>Yes, but where did the fawning MSM connect the desecration to Obama's taking office?

SS>>Is that a bait question, or are you and I implying the same thing here?
SS>>If I have to speculate, I'd say that Obama has not used that kind of rhetoric so it would be more difficult to invoke outrage based on what he has not done.

Clearly you're responding to Kevin's issue re linking Trump to desecration but not Obama. Your explanation refers to "that kind of rhetoric" which is nonsense unless Trump did use "that kind of rhetoric" to explain the different treatment.

This is your own point. Now you deny it and even try to say you were only responding about James Rosen.

As I said, no interest in a Mad Hatter's tea party.