>Where is the "unofficial" statement. Typically, if you are attempting to make a point, you would reference an "official" statement.

This came from Connie at MS.

>As for your own message board, if you get a good deal of MVP traffic, which is key, MS will monitor your site.

Right, after it had been evaluated.

>You do realize that the body of your posts states that the UT is an "unofficial" MVP site.. The banner would indicate otherwise..

Nope, I am bad with words as you have told before. The NewsGroups and UT are all official. There are 2-3 sites that are not.

>There is not enough traffic on the VB universal thread. So, while it could be an MVP site, nobody goes there. A moot point....

What does Moot mean? Anyway, you are exactly right, because of the low traffic there, MS doesn't feel that any VBer who awnsers many questions there is not a competitor (while maybe MVP or MVP worthy), there is just not enough of a challenge to make it a deciding site.