>>Someone told me something that seems pattently
>>ridiculous to me. They claim (anecdotally) that
>>they've seen "significant" speed improvements by
>>not running batch programs in full screen mode.
>>The further claim that the smaller they can make
>>the screen size, the faster it runs.
>>
>>I'v not read anything, nor seen anything to support
>>such a claim, but I'm wondering if any of you have?
>>
>> ...kt
>
>Hi Keith,
>
>This isn't really an answer to your question, just a comment.
>
>One of the purposes of the Windows Script Host (along with either JScript or VBScript files) was to more or less serve as a replacement for the DOS batch file. There are only a couple of things that can't be done directly by a JScript or VBScript file. This doesn't mean that they can't be done. Further, there are a whole host (no pun intended) of other things that the WSH can do that a DOS batch file can't. So in other words, if there was a DOS batch file that had to be run on a regular basis, I'd definetely look into converting it to WSH.

I'm sorry George, re-reading my note I can see how
I caused some confusion here. I meant that it is
a batch mode VFP program as opposed to an
interactive mode.

I'm not, however, familiar with WHS. Where can I
get some more information on it?

...kt