>That's an interesting idea JC. I'm still waiting for a call-back from our local Microsoft rep. on the licensing issue. We've already decided that if we need to purchase a bunch of licenses for replication we'll look into "rolling our own." I read a little about how it works in SQL Server. Apparently, most of it is SP based anyway.
>
>I'll post my findings here.
>
>Persisted recordsets is an ADO thing, right?
>
>Marty
>
>

Right. Now, I've never heard about doing replication with SP's so thanks for the idea.

>>
>>Does it have to be a replication solution? You can also use persisted recordsets and make batch updates to the central server.