>
>I think rather than Visual FoxBasic (VFB), what you want for this
>application is Visual FoxBasic for Applications (VFBA). VFBA is probably
>best suited to mimic the "look and feel" of Access. I had a beta a while
>back (build date 04/01/97) and it started choking on tables that had more
>than 20,000 records, just like Access. It also seemed to have similar
>performance traits as Access when more than 4 or 5 users attempted to
>utilize the application at the same time. Unfortunately, Visual FoxBasic
>for Applications has suffered from a curious lack of marketing from
>Microsoft. I've started to suspect that this apparent snub might be due
>to reports of a horrible new macro virus which can attach itself to your
>database tables.
>
Excellent! Now I have it all in perspective.
==Carl
Carl J. WarnerVFUG OfficerThe early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.