>I don't care about the points. IMO, it's a flawed system.
Not a criticism, but my views on the points...
I think all us of were torn about the feature, but something had to be done about recognizing contributions of members. At least this is partially being done now. I look at the top two names on the list (Cetin and Vlad). Both well worthy of recognition and perhaps not able to afford PUTMs otherwise. Another thing I like about the system is that the UT members are choosing who is worthy, rather than the UT. Very democratic.
Any feedback to improve the system appreciated.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only