>Your attempts to down play my knowledge about C# and .NET have backfired on you -
<

How so?

<<
yet your statement proves that you know very little about VB since you couldn't even name a utility written in VB for VB <lol>.
<<

I think VBAssist was written in VB. All of the add-ins that ship with VB are written in VB. Dataclas COM was written in VB (I wrote the first version) SQLAudit is written in VB.

How's that for a start... lol back to you...< bg >...

<
And here you are trying boost VB.NET and portray it's power. John, how much do you really know about VB.NET?
>

Enough to be teaching it this year for a MS ATEC.....Enough to have written feature articles using the language...

>
So basically, you're agreeing with on the fact that C# is better suited for the .NET Framework.
<

No...It is simply a .NET langauge that can work with the framework - albeit at a lower level than other languages. As far as certain types of apps and/or certain types of developers, some will prefer C# and some will prefer VB. The power is in the framework and those who peg themselves to a specific language as a per se rule are using yesterday's thinking...