<<
Oh, and by the way, you criticise somebody who was a MVP who had large message counts but low technical accuracy. Well, at least he *tried* to answer technical questions.
<<
The award is for PAST work, not what one does currently. I will be the first to admit that in the past year, my technical posting level does not warrant the award for 2002.
I think that hits the salient part of your post...
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement