>Nope. We choose C#.Net. While Delphi is better, C# is an overwhelming choice by decision makers i.e. consultants, it managers, software architects.
>
>Reasons:
>1. C# is ECMA standard, and so we will be seeing 3rd party compilers of various platforms .
>2. C# is java like language which gives us better standing if we need to use another one.
>3. C# is being touted as the language of the future and MS strategically positioned it that way.
>4. C# has higher profile than any .NET language available today.
>5. Most of my colleagues don't know either VB or C, and so starting from scratch might as well go with C#.

Thank you for your input. Deos this mean learning C# will be easier than learning VB or just that one might as well go with C# and forget VB, VFP etc.? Comments? And if Delphi is a good tool and Borland a company that stands behind its products and markets all its products effectively (assumption), then what would it take to sway decision makers to move towards Borlands products?