>>>David,
>>>
>>>'&&' is documented in Fox 2.6 help as I pointed out in my previous post.
>>>Anyway, is '&&' is implemented or not can be verified w/o help file. In Fox 2.6 the following line throws 'syntax error'. Separating '&' eliminates the error.

* Syntax error
>>>lcText = "abs&&"
>>>* No errors
>>>lcText = "abs&" + "&"
>>>

>>>
>>
>>same results in Fox2.5
>
>Hi Gunnar,
>
>Thanks for confirming it for Fox 2.5

Hi Sergey

You are welcome

just checked in Fox2.0 - also the same results there (that's as far back as i can go)