General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
Why do you assume the 2010 support date is the only information he is bringing to the meeting?
Why do you assume that there is a .Net guy lurking about it, this not in PA? Maybe there is a Linux guy lurking, maybe no one, it does not matter, it was a VFP question not a what should I use question.
I know that "supported until 2010" does help non-technical people deal with the claims from the .Net guys that VFP is dead in 1-2 years.
The point is a specific question was asked. No attempt to answer his question was given, a rational for using .Net was given.
It is easy to start a new thread.
>>
>
>Sorry, but Kevin has not hi-jacked the thread. A question was asked re: the support of VFP until 2010 or whenever. As a Fox developer as well being a .NET, SQL Server, and Oracle Developer, I can tell you that if all you have in the chamber is a reference that the product will be "supported" until 2010, the .NET guy is going to win that argument - hands down.
>
>Better for the guy to be prepared - and most likely - to lose.
>
>You guys need to get out of this dream-land that "support until 2010" is something significant that you can hang your hat on....
>
>Time to get your head - and other body parts - out of the sand...
>
>John
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only