>No no no - creationism teaches a lie - a controvention of the laws of physics. The purpose of teaching creationism is not to provide a basis for understanding. The purpose of teaching creations is to soften you up so that you will be open to the next lie.

How did you possibly tie the statement above to the statements below?

>Lies like: Jews are not human - therefore we can exterminate them
>Lies like: Muslims are not human, therefore we can exterminate them.
>Lies like: Christians are less than human - therefore we can exterminate them/

>To accept creationism is to deny the technology that makes a computer or MRI work.

How?

>Teaching creationism is like saying 2 + 2 is 3. Classic Orwellian technique. And I am not trying to be an elitess snob. You have eyes, you are a geek and you should be a parent before you are a savant of preacher or prophet that may, after much pain, proove to be false. Question your religious elders as you zealously question me - and we will all be safer!

I think you're rambling on this one, but how do you know that they don't question their religious elders? It's not black and white. In fact, there are many highly regarding scientist who do not rule out creationism.

>It's a classic Orwellian technique hand has nothing to do with philosophy. You need to study Georger Orwell (1984) and Machiavelle. Everytime I see a bikini clad girls in a beer commercial - I watch that commercial - but I don;t drink beer!

Are you implying that anyone who follows religious teachings is an idiot?

>Some people see Dubya - and think god is working through him - by all measure of Christianity - that is heresy - that ius abominable - if you thing a "man" is spoken to by god - then you need to study your bible and quit listening to the preacher or the principal at your private, taxempt religious school.

You have put me in the fringe. I am very much mainstream and never thought that Bush's actions were defined by his god.